This has been a very animated
week here in Catalunya. As the day nears
for the vote on a referendum to decide whether or not Catalans want to remain
part of Spain, the pace of the moves on both sides quickens and intensifies. You might think that “both sides” refers to
both sides of the question to be voted. And
you would be wrong. “Both sides” refers
to the Catalan government that is committed to its citizens to hold the vote on
one side, and the Spanish government that is committed to blocking it on the
other. Because Spain is supposedly a
modern (western!) country and part of the European Union, one might wonder why
voting would be an issue. In order to be
admitted to the EU a country has to demonstrate that it is a democracy, and Spain
managed to be accepted. Now that it is a
member, the EU doesn’t really want to be bothered about whether or not it is
democratic and whether or not it prohibits its citizens from voting and telling
their elected representatives unequivocally what they want.
The last few days went like
this. On 19 September, a week after 1.8
million people demonstrated in Barcelona saying they wanted to vote, the
Catalan parliament approved a law that allowed for the people to be “consulted”
and called for the consultation to be held on 9 November. It was passed by the overwhelming majority of
106 to 28. A consultation differs from a
referendum in that it does not become a law (as would a proposition voted on an
American state ballot). It tells the
government (the Catalan government) what the voters want in reference to a
subject of importance to them. It is
then up to the government to negotiate if necessary and to implement their wish.
In its concept, it is more
democratic than the usual procedure of voting for a person (here you vote for a
party) and hoping that the person or party will do what was promised in a
campaign. When you vote in a consultation,
you are being consulted by your government; you are telling all your
representatives exactly what you do or do not want them to do on a specific
issue.
Oriol Junkeras (ERC), representing the Catalan left and Artur Mas (CiU) representing the Catalan right: Two unlikely allies who have set their ideological differences aside to work for a common goal |
On Saturday 29 September Artur Mas, President of the Generalitat of Catalunya, signed the Law of Consultations.
On Sunday 30 September
Spanish President Rajoy met with his cabinet, not to discuss how they might
discuss this crisis with the Catalan government, but to take steps to block the
Consultation.
The complaint, saying that
the Law of Consultations was unconstitutional, was filed with the Spanish
Constitutional Court on Monday morning. Not
scheduled to meet, the members of the Court flew to their chambers, held a
special emergency meeting, and on Monday afternoon the Court agreed to consider
it and that immediately suspended the new Catalan Law of Consultations.
Given the great speed by
which these high-level bodies met and acted whereas this type of thing usually
takes weeks or months to be looked at by the Court, President Mas made the
comment that it was all done at supersonic speed. One might also wonder how it was that the
Court, that had never been called to a meeting so quickly, agreed to meet that
same day. It looks to some as if the
Constitutional Court simply takes its orders from the Spanish government. This could be substantiated by the fact that
the Court’s President, Francisco Perez de los Cabos, was a member of the
governing party (PP) while he was a judge (he later quit his party membership)
while he was a judge, even though the Spanish Constitution forbids it. He was not dismissed. Why would the PP want to dismiss one of their
own?
On Tuesday, the Catalan
government temporarily suspended preparations for the Consultation, the issue
to be discussed by the political parties in favor of holding the Consultation
later in the week.
On Wednesday, the Catalan
government filed an appeal to the Constitutional Court requesting that the
suspension be lifted.
It is not surprising that,
although it is already Friday, there has been no response from the Court. In fact, it isn’t clear when they will meet
to consider this appeal. Some things do
not happen at supersonic speed.
After writing and posting this, I read a special announcement. The Catalan political parties that support the right to vote finished their 7-hour meeting. They include CIU, the Catalan right wing, ERC, the Catalan left wing, the Greens, and CUP the radicals (for lack of a better definition -- they continue to baffle me). They pretty much cover the Catalan political spectrum (minus the socialists who don't seem to think that voting is a fundamental right in a democracy) and have all agreed that they will go ahead with the Consultation. They say that voting is a basic democratic right and neither the central government in Madrid nor the Constitutional Court has the right to prohibit it.
Further reading:
From the Harvard Political Review: http://harvardpolitics.com/world/catalonia-contention/
OpEd from the LA Times: http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-cole-catalonia-independence-20141001-story.htmlAfter writing and posting this, I read a special announcement. The Catalan political parties that support the right to vote finished their 7-hour meeting. They include CIU, the Catalan right wing, ERC, the Catalan left wing, the Greens, and CUP the radicals (for lack of a better definition -- they continue to baffle me). They pretty much cover the Catalan political spectrum (minus the socialists who don't seem to think that voting is a fundamental right in a democracy) and have all agreed that they will go ahead with the Consultation. They say that voting is a basic democratic right and neither the central government in Madrid nor the Constitutional Court has the right to prohibit it.
Further reading:
From the Harvard Political Review: http://harvardpolitics.com/world/catalonia-contention/
No comments:
Post a Comment